Easy Ophthalmology · About · Disclaimer

Author: Claude (AI), from PubMed abstracts · Reviewed by: Dr Mina Abdelmseih · Reviewed: 2026-11-15 · Review due: 2027-11-15

Educational content only. Not personalised medical advice. Clinical decisions remain the responsibility of the treating clinician.

Corneal transplantation: DMEK, DSAEK and DALK

Corneal transplantation replaces diseased corneal tissue with donor tissue: full thickness in penetrating keratoplasty (PK), or selectively in lamellar techniques such as deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for stromal disease and endothelial keratoplasty (EK: DSAEK and DMEK) for endothelial disease [S1] [S2]. Lamellar techniques reduce rejection compared with PK [S2] [S10] [S12]. Graft rejection is the most common cause of late graft failure after PK [S4].

Key points - For Fuchs dystrophy and bullous keratopathy, EK appears to give higher 5-year graft survival and lower rejection than PK, on low-level evidence [S10]. - DMEK gives better visual acuity than ultrathin DSAEK but needs more re-bubbling [S9] [S11]. - For keratoconus, DALK and PK give comparable vision; DALK has less rejection [S2] [S12]. - After PK, pseudophakic or aphakic corneal oedema and prior glaucoma raise the risk of graft failure [S3]. - Evidence for immunosuppressants to prevent rejection after PK is largely low quality [S4].

Evidence last checked: 2026-10-17 (PubMed abstracts).

Red flags

Recognise it: who needs a graft

Confirm it: choosing the technique

Close-up of a blue-grey eye with a faint circular graft edge around the cornea and two fine dark stitches.
An eye one year after a cornea transplant, with the edge of the donor cornea visible and two stitches still in place. Image: Megor1, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons, resized to 800 px wide and re-encoded as JPEG.
Four blocks of cornea side by side, each layered epithelium, stroma, Descemet membrane and endothelium, with donor tissue shaded green. PK is green throughout; DALK is green down to Descemet membrane; DSAEK has an extra green layer of back stroma, Descemet membrane and endothelium under the patient's stroma; DMEK has only a thin green Descemet and endothelium layer.
Penetrating keratoplasty replaces the full thickness of the cornea, DALK replaces the front layers and keeps the patient's own Descemet membrane and endothelium, and the endothelial grafts replace the back layers: DSAEK with a thin layer of back stroma, DMEK with Descemet membrane and endothelium only. Original illustration (schematic), not a photograph or scan of a real patient. Easy Ophthalmology; drawn by Claude (AI), 2026-10-18; awaiting the Editor-in-Chief's review.

Manage it

Before acting on this section, check the national and local guidelines, product information and regulatory approvals that apply where you practise. See the medical disclaimer.

Tier A (primary care / no specialist)

Tier B (general eye clinic)

Tier C (specialist centre)

Refer when

Situation Urgency
Grafted eye with redness, pain, photophobia or reduced vision (possible rejection or infection) Same-day to the graft surgeon or cornea service [G1]
Raised intraocular pressure on post-graft steroids Urgent to an eye clinic; timing per your local service or specialist advice [S7]
Corneal oedema or scarring reducing vision, suitable for grafting Routine to a cornea service; timing per your local service or specialist advice

Pitfalls

Evidence notes

Source Date Design
[S1] 2014 Cochrane systematic review, 3 RCTs
[S2] 2014 Cochrane systematic review, 2 RCTs
[S3] 2015 Cornea Donor Study, multicentre masked trial, 1090 participants
[S4] 2015 Cochrane systematic review, 6 RCTs
[S5] 2018 Cohort within the Cornea Preservation Time RCT, 1330 eyes
[S6] 2021 Survey of Indian corneal surgeons (DALK)
[S7] 2022 Systematic review and meta-analysis, 49 studies
[S8] 2022 Survey of Indian corneal surgeons (DMEK)
[S9] 2023 Meta-analysis, 7 studies
[S10] 2023 Systematic review of 50 cohort studies
[S11] 2024 Review of 4 systematic reviews
[S12] 2025 Meta-analysis, 47 studies

Related articles

References

See the numbered source list below. Each marker [S#] links to its PubMed and DOI record.

Sources

  1. [S1] Nanavaty MA, Wang X, Shortt AJ Endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2014). PubMed 24526345 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008420.pub3
  2. [S2] Keane M, Coster D, Ziaei M, Williams K Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for treating keratoconus. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2014). PubMed 25055058 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009700.pub2
  3. [S3] Writing Committee for the Cornea Donor Study Research Group, Sugar A, Gal RL, Kollman C, Raghinaru D, Dontchev M, et al. Factors associated with corneal graft survival in the cornea donor study. JAMA ophthalmology. (2015). PubMed 25322173 · doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.3923
  4. [S4] Abudou M, Wu T, Evans JR, Chen X Immunosuppressants for the prophylaxis of corneal graft rejection after penetrating keratoplasty. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2015). PubMed 26313245 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007603.pub2
  5. [S5] Terry MA, Aldave AJ, Szczotka-Flynn LB, Liang W, Ayala AR, Maguire MG, et al. Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study. Ophthalmology. (2018). PubMed 30098353 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.002
  6. [S6] Fogla R, Sahay P, Sharma N Preferred practice pattern and observed outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty - A survey of Indian corneal surgeons. Indian journal of ophthalmology. (2021). PubMed 34011739 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_3067_20
  7. [S7] Magnier F, Dutheil F, Pereira B, Watson SL, Baker JS, Chiambaretta F, et al. Preventive treatment of allograft rejection after endothelial keratoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta ophthalmologica. (2022). PubMed 35411680 · doi:10.1111/aos.15154
  8. [S8] Sahay P, Fogla R, Sharma N Preferred practice pattern for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty surgeries: A survey of Indian corneal surgeons. Indian journal of ophthalmology. (2022). PubMed 35918952 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_244_22
  9. [S9] Maier AB, Milek J, Joussen AM, Dietrich-Ntoukas T, Lichtner G Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty. American journal of ophthalmology. (2023). PubMed 36220351 · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2022.09.013
  10. [S10] Lemaitre D, Tourabaly M, Borderie V, Dechartres A Long-term Outcomes After Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty Compared With Penetrating Keratoplasty for Corneal Endothelial Dysfunction: A Systematic Review. Cornea. (2023). PubMed 37185592 · doi:10.1097/ico.0000000000003240
  11. [S11] Moura-Coelho N, Papa-Vettorazzi R, Reyes A, Cunha JP, Güell JL Ultrathin DSAEK versus DMEK - Review of systematic reviews. European journal of ophthalmology. (2024). PubMed 37964555 · doi:10.1177/11206721231214605
  12. [S12] A Awad A, M Elettreby A, A Abo Elnaga A, A Alsaied M, M Aboelkhier M, Saleh MM, et al. Penetrating Keratoplasty versus Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 27,018 Eyes. Seminars in ophthalmology. (2025). PubMed 39943883 · doi:10.1080/08820538.2025.2457583

Guidelines

  1. [G1] NHS Scotland (Community Eyecare Guidelines, eyes.nhs.scot). 5.6 Transplant Rejection, Corneal (2026). https://www.eyes.nhs.scot/eyecare-guidelines/section-5-corneal/56-transplant-rejection-corneal/