Easy Ophthalmology · About · Disclaimer

Author: Claude (AI), from PubMed abstracts · Reviewed by: Dr Mina Abdelmseih · Reviewed: 2026-11-15 · Review due: 2027-11-15

Educational content only. Not personalised medical advice. Clinical decisions remain the responsibility of the treating clinician.

Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is the most common form of retinal detachment: a retinal break lets fluid pass from the vitreous cavity into the subretinal space, separating the retina [S1] [S4]. It occurs in about 1 in 10,000 people a year [S1], and macula-involving RRD is one of the most common ophthalmic surgical emergencies [S11]. Vitrectomy, scleral buckling and pneumatic retinopexy are all accepted repairs with broadly similar final outcomes [S4] [S6].

Key points - Macula-off detachment carries worse vision and more distortion after repair than macula-on detachment [S7] [S10]. - Point-of-care ultrasound is 94.2% sensitive and 96.3% specific for RRD when the fundus view is limited or no ophthalmologist is available [S3]. - Vitrectomy and scleral buckling give similar reattachment and vision; vitrectomy causes more cataract and new breaks, buckling more choroidal detachment [S4] [S6]. - Pneumatic retinopexy, in selected eyes, gave better vision but lower single-operation success than vitrectomy in the PIVOT RCT [S2]. - No drug to prevent proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is established [S12].

Evidence last checked: 2026-10-17 (PubMed abstracts).

Red flags

Recognise it

Wide-field greenish fundus image of the peripheral retina showing horseshoe-shaped defects in an elevated retina.
Fundus image of a rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with a horseshoe-shaped retinal tear. Image: Amaris5, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons, resized to 800 px wide and re-encoded as JPEG.
Cross-section of an eye. Near the top, a dashed vitreous strand pulls on a flap at a retinal break; a blue arrow passes through the break into a pale blue pocket of subretinal fluid under the lifted retina. The retina near the optic nerve, at the macula, is still flat against the back wall.
In rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, vitreous traction causes a full-thickness retinal break, and fluid passes from the vitreous cavity through the break into the subretinal space, lifting the retina; here the macula is still attached. Original illustration (schematic), not a photograph or scan of a real patient. Easy Ophthalmology; drawn by Claude (AI), 2026-10-18; awaiting the Editor-in-Chief's review.

Confirm it

Greyscale B-scan ultrasound of the eye showing a bright, folded membrane rising from the back of the eye in a V shape.
Ocular ultrasound of a retinal detachment in a patient with vision reduced to light perception. Image: CheckDO, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons, resized to 800 px wide and re-encoded as JPEG.

Manage it

Before acting on this section, check the national and local guidelines, product information and regulatory approvals that apply where you practise. See the medical disclaimer.

Tier A (primary care / no specialist)

Tier B (general eye clinic)

Tier C (specialist centre)

  1. Vitrectomy vs scleral buckling (simple RRD). A Cochrane review of 10 RCTs (1,307 eyes) found little or no difference in reattachment or vision, fewer redetachments with vitrectomy (risk ratio 0.75), more cataract (risk ratio 1.71) and new breaks with vitrectomy, and more choroidal detachment with buckling (all low certainty) [S4]. A meta-analysis of 15,947 eyes found similar primary (86.5% vs 84.8%) and final reattachment, with a slightly better final acuity after buckling driven by observational studies and phakic eyes [S6].
  2. Pneumatic retinopexy. In PIVOT (176 patients with a single break or breaks within 1 clock hour in the upper retina), pneumatic retinopexy gave 4.9 letters better vision at 12 months and less metamorphopsia, but lower primary success (80.8% vs 93.2%); secondary success was about 99% in both groups, and 65% of phakic eyes after vitrectomy vs 16% after pneumatic retinopexy underwent cataract surgery within 12 months [S2]. A meta-analysis of 6 comparative studies found higher primary reattachment with vitrectomy and similar final success and vision [S9]. Against buckling, pneumatic retinopexy may reattach slightly less often but with fewer complications (low certainty) [S5].
  3. Intraoperative choices. Perfluorocarbon liquid during vitrectomy reduced metamorphopsia (risk ratio 0.61) [S10]. Gas vs silicone oil made little or no difference to metamorphopsia [S10].
  4. Positioning. After vitrectomy with gas for macula-involving RRD, immediate face-down positioning may reduce retinal displacement, outer retinal folds and diplopia but may increase raised intraocular pressure (very low certainty) [S11].
  5. PVR. In a network meta-analysis of 23 studies, most drugs did not improve reattachment or reduce PVR recurrence; only 13-cis-retinoic acid showed a significant effect, needing confirmation [S12].
  6. Children. Single-operation success was about 64% and final success about 84% [S8].

Refer when

Situation Urgency
Suspected or confirmed RRD with the macula still attached Immediate, same-day transfer to a vitreoretinal surgeon; PIVOT treated macula-on eyes within 24 hours [S2]
Macula-off RRD Emergency, within 24 hours; PIVOT treated macula-off eyes within 72 hours [S2] [EIC expert opinion]
Pain, high pressure or vision loss after RRD surgery Same-day review by the surgical team

Pitfalls

Evidence notes

Source Date Design
[S1] 2014 Systematic review (BMJ Clinical Evidence), 14 studies
[S2] 2019 RCT (PIVOT), 176 patients
[S3] 2019 Diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis, 11 studies
[S4] 2019 Cochrane systematic review, 10 RCTs
[S5] 2021 Cochrane systematic review, 3 RCTs
[S6] 2022 Meta-analysis, 8 RCTs and 33 observational studies
[S7] 2023 Meta-analysis of 29 observational studies
[S8] 2023 Meta-analysis, paediatric RRD
[S9] 2023 Meta-analysis of 6 comparative studies
[S10] 2024 Meta-analysis, 12 studies
[S11] 2024 Cochrane systematic review, 3 RCTs
[S12] 2025 Network meta-analysis, 23 studies

Related articles

References

See the numbered source list below. Each marker [S#] links to its PubMed and DOI record.

Sources

  1. [S1] Steel D Retinal detachment. BMJ clinical evidence. (2014). PubMed 24807890
  2. [S2] Hillier RJ, Felfeli T, Berger AR, Wong DT, Altomare F, Dai D, et al. The Pneumatic Retinopexy versus Vitrectomy for the Management of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT). Ophthalmology. (2019). PubMed 30468761 · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.11.014
  3. [S3] Gottlieb M, Holladay D, Peksa GD Point-of-Care Ocular Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. (2019). PubMed 30636351 · doi:10.1111/acem.13682
  4. [S4] Znaor L, Medic A, Binder S, Vucinovic A, Marin Lovric J, Puljak L Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckling for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2019). PubMed 30848830 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd009562.pub2
  5. [S5] Sena DF, Kilian R, Liu SH, Rizzo S, Virgili G Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckle for repairing simple rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2021). PubMed 34762741 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008350.pub3
  6. [S6] Dhoot AS, Popovic MM, Nichani PAH, Eshtiaghi A, Mihalache A, Sayal AP, et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus scleral buckle: A comprehensive meta-analysis of 15,947 eyes. Survey of ophthalmology. (2022). PubMed 34896191 · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.12.005
  7. [S7] Murtaza F, Goud R, Belhouari S, Eng KT, Mandelcorn ED, da Costa BR, et al. Prognostic Features of Preoperative OCT in Retinal Detachments: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. Retina. (2023). PubMed 36435422 · doi:10.1016/j.oret.2022.11.011
  8. [S8] Abdi F, Aghajani A, Hemmati S, Moosavi D, Gordiz A, Chaibakhsh S, et al. Pediatric rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A meta-analysis of clinical features, surgical success rate, and prognostic factors. Indian journal of ophthalmology. (2023). PubMed 36872666 · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_643_22
  9. [S9] Karam M, Alsaif A, Kahlar N, Hayre A, Vyas N, Ekitok SR, et al. Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging retina. (2023). PubMed 37222541 · doi:10.3928/23258160-20230508-03
  10. [S10] Chen Z, Liu W, Liu G, Lu P Incidence of Metamorphopsia After Successful Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Seminars in ophthalmology. (2024). PubMed 37940621 · doi:10.1080/08820538.2023.2279221
  11. [S11] Fung TH, Yim TW, Lois N, Wright DM, Liu SH, Williamson T Face-down positioning or posturing after pars plana vitrectomy for macula-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. (2024). PubMed 38488250 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015514.pub2
  12. [S12] Khosravi Mirzaei S, Hatami F, Safi S, Khorrami Z, Khosravi Shadmani F, Moshtaghion SM, et al. Pharmacological agents for treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Survey of ophthalmology. (2025). PubMed 40032070 · doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2025.02.005